Too much luggage under the eyes to show my face... |
A couple months ago, I decided I needed to read actual news
articles, not just opinion pieces about news. I thought, since I’m a big girl
now, that it might behoove me to read facts presented to me and draw my own
conclusions about them, rather than let other people tell me what to think
about selected facts. That meant that I resisted what had been my favorite
section of The New York Times – the Sunday Review – in favor of that thing in
which they wrap the Sunday Review. I
think it’s called the front page?
And it was good. Indeed, just two weeks ago I read an
incredible story about a death that appeared to be suicide, but may have been
murder from domestic violence. This story, which I saved, would make a
fantastic novel. And just before I saw that article I was thinking about how
I’d love to write another novel, only I don’t have a plot. I am not good with
plot. Well, this front page article contained a plot, let me tell you. I wish
Elmore Leonard were still around. He would write a doozy of a novel about that.
Does that sound callous? It does, doesn’t it, Readers? I’m
sorry. I don’t mean to be callous.
My point is that last weekend I caved and read the Sunday Review. There were two pieces that resonated with me. One was about the Real Humanities
Crisis. Here is it is, if you want to read it. The other one was about the
Millenials, who are, FYI, defined as people born between 1980 and 2000, which
also means they are Generation Y, which means there are two names for them,
which seems unfair. Although come to think of it, there are two names for my
generation, Generation X. Namely, Gen X and Slackers. And before you whip out
your calculators, classmates, I know that technically I am a Baby Boomer, but
there is just nothing about baby boomers that relates to me, and everything
about Generation X that does. Here is that article for your edification.
One article is about how the Millenials are searchers,
looking for a new definition of success and for lives full of meaning. Which
means that perhaps I am actually a Millenial, because – hello - I am a searcher
and I’ve been reframing success. This article, by the way, starts out by
characterizing the millenials as the”most self-absorbed generation, ever.” But
I distinctly recall the Me Generation being called that. And come to think of
it, just who are the Me Generation? I have a sinking feeling that is also my
generation.
The conclusion to draw here is that every older generation
looks at the twenty somethings coming up behind it and thinks these
twenty-somethings are the most selfish ever. That's simple envy: underemployed twenty-somethings have a lot more time to dawdle in cafés and grow beards than fully grown up folk.
But the article goes on to say that in fact these Millenials
have been “forced to rethink success so that it’s less about material
prosperity and more about something else.” And that something else is,
apparently, meaning. They want to make a difference. They want to do good. Indeed, more than happiness, they want meaning in their lives.
And my researches on success lead me to conclude that,
therefore, they will succeed.
Then there’s the other article, called, “The Real Humanities
Crisis.” This is about the plight of most creative people, as well as about
jobs in K-12 education, which should fall under the rubric Ways for Creatives
to Earn a Decent Living Doing Something Meaningful. Sad to say, now those jobs are being strangled by
standardized testing, and any parent of a public school student knows how
beleaguered The Arts are, since there’s not a direct link between arts
education and friggin’ test scores. There is a link, though – don’t get me
started. I don’t have room here for that discussion.
“Most creative artists, even successful ones, are not able
to earn a living.” That’s what the article says. You know, it’s good to see
that in print. And bad. Most of all, it’s a relief. Of course it’s the final
dousing of any idea I had of, um, making a living from my writing. From my
creative writing, that is. But it lifts one burden of failure from me. If most
creative artists can’t make a living from their creations, then failure to make
a living is not a sign of failure as a creative artist. It’s just failure to
make a living.
I am sure I’ve mentioned this before, but when the financial
crisis happened in 2008, New York Times
columnist Judith Warner wrote about commuting into NYC on the train surrounded
by Wall Streeters and lawyers and how she had come to feel diminished or
unappreciated for being a journalist. She saw herself as surrounded by people
who felt that choosing to do a job that didn’t maximize one’s income potential
was morally suspect. Or at least idiotic. Now that these people, some of
them, were out of jobs, she thought maybe people like her, or people who had
chosen helping professions that didn’t have super high incomes, might come to
be respected again. At least that’s what I think she wrote. Memory does strange
things, though. Perhaps she said nothing of the sort. Perhaps I’m putting my
own words into her pen.
I certainly relate to that sentiment. I’ve both imbibed that
message and struggle against it. It’s one of my biggest conflicts: choosing to
do what I love and think is important (writing and being a full time mom) makes
me feel that I’ve done something misguided and foolish. Sometimes. The
opportunity costs seem too high. Sometimes.
Maybe the Millenials won’t struggle with the same conflict.
As the article says, they have been forced to look beyond making money to find
satisfaction. According to the article, studies show that when economic times
are pinched, young people turn to helping others. When economic times are
expansive, I guess, they tend to fill their pots with money - screw meaning. But times are not so expansive. Thus,
people are reconsidering how they spend their days. “The point of work should
not be just to provide the material goods we need to survive,” says philosopher
Gary Cutting. “Since work typically takes the largest part of our time, it
should also be an important part of what gives your life meaning.”
Hooray for the searchers, I say! I also say thank you in
advance, since they – those Millenials – are the largest generation since the
Baby Boomers and they’re going to have to help support me when I’m old. I’m pretty sure the government isn’t
about to start handing out pensions to mothers and writers. But I could be
wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment